We must take a moment to thank the White House for doing all of our work for us. We, in what Rumsfeld called the “reality based community”, have been called conspiracy theorists and supporters of terrorism among other things due to our resolve to stick to the facts regardless of what Obama reads off the teleprompter. Contrary to what the corporate special interest media might continue to babble about, we have been fully vindicated and Obama’s story has been confirmed as 100% false narrative and a bold-faced lie. It amazes me how people would listen to what he said and unquestioningly start cheering and praising our incredibly inept president. Thankfully, those people might start to get their cages rattled a bit by this recent blatant, out-and-out lie sold to us by Obama. He couldn’t even manage to lie well, maintaining no facial expression whatsoever while delivering his speech in zombie form.

In his speech, Obama lied so many times it is hard to count but I will attempt to. In case you haven’t seen the hilariously false narrative, watch it below.

It starts out with some tear-jerking, heart-string pulling rhetoric to soften people up for the incoming torrent of completely fraudulent information. Well at least his speech writers know about psychology, right?

The first lie starts when he claims that the attacks on September 11th were quickly linked to al Qaeda. Maybe Obama means the media when he says “we quickly linked the attack to al Qaeda” because the media ran with the ridiculous notion that a man in a cave in Afghanistan who just happened to be a CIA asset organized the most physics defying attack in recorded history. The only “evidence” they had was a series of cell phone and air phone calls that supposedly said there were Arab hijackers on the plane with box cutters and knives praising Allah and vowing to use the planes as “large guided missiles.” Too bad it is absolutely impossible to make a phone call from that altitude. Whoops! Here are some professionals in the industry confirming this information, garnered from the wonderful research here.

“Wireless communications networks weren’t designed for ground-to-air communication. Cellular experts privately admit that they’re surprised the calls were able to be placed from the hijacked planes, and that they lasted as long as they did. They speculate that the only reason that the calls went through in the first place is that the aircraft were flying so close to the ground” Source.

Additionally, soon after the horrific events on 9/11, an AT&T spokesmen said,

“it was almost a fluke that the [9/11] calls reached their destinations… From high altitudes, the call quality is not very good, and most callers will experience drops. Although calls are not reliable, callers can pick up and hold calls for a little while below a certain altitude” Source.

Unfortunately for the official story, the calls were not made from low altitudes. Furthermore, only until after 9/11 had a company announced that they would be developing air-to-ground and ground-to-air cell communications,

Within days of the release of the 9/11 Commission Report in July, American Airlines and Qualcomm, proudly announced the development of a new wireless technology –which will at some future date allow airline passengers using their cell phones to contact family and friends from a commercial aircraft. Source.

In fact, Aviation Week describes the technology in the following report printed 07/20/04,

“Qualcomm and American Airlines are exploring [July 2004] ways for passengers to use commercial cell phones inflight for air-to-ground communication. In a recent 2-hr. proof-of-concept flight, representatives from government and the media used commercial Code Division Multiple Access (CDMA) third-generation cell phones to place and receive calls and text messages from friends on the ground.

For the test flight from Dallas-Fort Worth, the aircraft was equipped with an antenna in the front and rear of the cabin to transmit cell phone calls to a small in-cabin CDMA cellular base station. This “pico cell” transmitted cell phone calls from the aircraft via a Globalstar satellite to the worldwide terrestrial phone network”

Quite interesting that the supposed cell phone calls weren’t even possible by September 11th, 2001. This article contains a plethora of facts directly contradicting the supposed “evidence” used by the 9/11 commission. To boil it down, we can confidently say that there was no real evidence that the hijackers were al Qaeda terrorists in league with bin Laden. Unless you take the passports that magically hit the ground completely intact after a commercial jet rammed into the side of one of the Towers and blew up. That must be the first time in human history that several pieces of paper made it to the ground after being in the front of a commercial jet that rammed into a sky scraper and promptly created massive fires that caused the building to collapse. I don’t know about you but that seems dubious to say the least.

If one has a few hundred hours to spend, one could scour the internet and compile a report based on irrefutable fact at least three times the size of the 9/11 commission’s report, all of which would not be filled with the holes, inaccuracies, and all of the evidence that the commission was barred from seeing. Do you not find it strange that a government investigation into the events would be blocked from many pertinent government documents? Why would the government block any requests unless there was at least advance knowledge of the attacks. The blatant restrictions put on the 9/11 commission’s investigation point to the fact that the government was not only well aware that the attacks would take place but that they had a hand in the attacks themselves. Why else would they hold back documents that were highly relevant to the investigation?

That is only the first lie and I could write at least 10,000 words on debunking that lie alone but I think it is more important for me to continue breaking down this false narrative as anyone can gather immense amounts of information on the subject without any help from me. If you can’t send me an e-mail and I’ll be happy to send you pertinent links if necessary although Google should be able to do all that hard work for you.

Oh but wait, I forgot the lie that preceded the egregious lie I covered above, the hilarious idea that the administration was committed to “bring those who committed this vicious attack to justice.” If that was even remotely accurate why was there no investigation into Bush, Cheney and Rumsfeld’s involvement? What about preparing troops in the region ready to attack before the events of 9/11 even transpired? What about the many warnings the administration received through intelligence? Why was the NORAD response protocol changed to allow more time before planes were put in the air months before the attacks, then quickly changed back? The fingers point solely to the US government, not to some twenty-something men from the Middle East who magically were able to do maneuvers in a commercial jet that most professional, long time pilots cannot emulate.

Okay, let’s move on.

“So we went to war against al Qaeda.” Oh, really Obama? Why did we airlift out the al Qaeda leadership and set them free? Even MSNBC couldn’t ignore that and reported,

in the past week, a half dozen or more Pakistani air force cargo planes landed in the Taliban-held city of Kunduz and evacuated to Pakistan hundreds of non-Afghan soldiers who fought alongside the Taliban and even al-Qaida against the United States.

One might make the baseless assertion that we couldn’t have known was the Pakistani air force was doing. Too bad we already had full control over the region and would know if a member of the Pakistani military went into Afghanistan to use the bathroom. The contention that we weren’t aware of this operation are flat-out absurd. One Northern Alliance soldier was quoted as saying,

“We had decided to kill all of them, and we are not happy with America for letting the planes come,” said the soldier, Mahmud Shah.

While the article makes sure to link the Pakistanis with al Qaeda and Taliban, one must realize the links were created by us. Sorry to burst that bubble but that is why bin Laden was brought in as a CIA asset. The article also says,

The history of American policy in Southwest Asia, from the shah of Iran to Saddam Hussein to Afghanistan and Pakistan, is marred by one example after another of short-term decisions that stored up enormous trouble for later.

That is the understatement of the century but one can’t blame a company that was at that time under the full ownership of GE, a corporation with immensely close ties to the government, for couching their words in ambiguity, making sure not to leave one with the rightful impression that this points entirely back to the United States. However, the author of the piece cannot deny the undeniable and glaringly obvious links back to the Pentagon’s knowledge and approval of this operation.

Are we allowing an army of anti-American zealots to live and fight another day for the sake of our convenient marriage with Pakistan’s current dictator? I wish I could quote Rumsfeld. I wish I could say “I doubt it.” I can’t.

I must commend the author for this piece and especially the bravery that must be required to print that one cannot doubt the fact that we are allowing al Qaeda to proceed in order to have an engineered opposition as we so often have in the past. To be honest I am surprised that MSNBC would even print this story but with the other “news outlets” covering it, I guess it wouldn’t look too good for them to blatantly ignore it.

There is a wealth of information in addition to the above showing that we are not fighting a war against al Qaeda but we are making sure they will continue to be able to fight so the government can hold the al Qaeda terrorist boogeyman above our heads. Not the least of which is the high ranking al Qaeda member eating lunch at the Pentagon with top brass just months after September 11th, 2001. This report didn’t come from a so-called conspiracy theorist like most ignorant Americans would conjecture, this was printed by both CBS and Fox News. Again, whoops!

He then claims that we have been succeeding in the “war on terror” (itself an oxymoron, as one cannot have a war on a feeling). How have we done that? We are still in Afghanistan and Iraq (although the latter has nothing to do with terrorism even remotely) and we are experiencing even more ridiculous police state measures, groping at the hands of TSA goons, and big brother-type surveillance and unwarranted wiretaps. How is that winning? It seems to me like we have just turned America into a real-world 1984 and since al Qaeda wasn’t even behind the attacks on 9/11 to begin with, who are we being protected from? The answer is, we are not being protected. We are being systematically dehumanized through prison-style tactics. That is, public humiliation through groping and strip searches, having naked images taken of us, being surrounded by overzealous police armed with increasingly ridiculous arsenals including tanks, infiltration of dissenting political groups which is completely unconstitutional, constant surveillance via cell phone tracking and warrantless wiretapping again wholly unconstitutional, and now we are even seeing the TSA sexually molesting children and others outside of airports! Combined with the absurd idea of the need for increased security after announcing bin Laden’s death nine years late, it seems to me that America is losing the war on terror. Do you not feel terrorized when receiving an “enhanced pat-down”, better characterized as molestation and sexual assault, in full public view in a busy airport?

“In Afghanistan we removed the Taliban government…” Well at least he didn’t lie here. We knowingly allowed them to be airlifted out of Afghanistan so they could continue their operations on behalf of the Pentagon. I seriously doubt that is what he meant but it can be loosely interpreted as factual, unlike everything else in his joke of a speech.

He even goes as far to say that we killed or captured people involved with the 9/11 plot. Maybe he means those remotely associated with al Qaeda who were too unfortunate to be placed in positions after being thoroughly tortured, like the al Qaeda terrorist leading the rebels in Libya. He probably means the man who was waterboarded (which is torture and nothing less) for a whopping five years at Guantanamo Bay and reportedly gave actionable intelligence on the whereabouts of bin Laden. Excuse me? Did he e-mail bin Laden to see where he was in that time at GitMo? Let’s not even bother with the fact that torture almost always provides un-actionable intelligence due to the fact that people will say anything after being tortured for long enough. This poor man probably confessed to coordinating the Peal Harbor attacks and admitted to being Santa Claus.

In fact, the CIA controlled leak known as WikiLeaks released documents to the Telegraph that said,

Only about 220 of the people detained are assessed by the Americans to be dangerous international terrorists. A further 380 people are lower-level foot-soldiers, either members of the Taliban or extremists who travelled to Afghanistan whose presence at the military facility is questionable.

At least a further 150 people are innocent Afghans or Pakistanis, including farmers, chefs and drivers who were rounded up or even sold to US forces and transferred across the world. In the top-secret documents, senior US commanders conclude that in dozens of cases there is “no reason recorded for transfer”.

The most mind blowing part is that according to the leaked documents, the Americans assessed these people as such! Wow! Furthermore,

About 20 juveniles, including a 14-year old boy have been held at Guantanamo. Several pensioners, including an 89 year old with serious health problems were incarcerated.People wearing a certain model of Casio watch from the 1980s were seized by American forces in Afghanistan on suspicion of being terrorists, because the watches were used as timers by Al-Qaeda. However, the vast majority of those captured for this reason have since been quietly released amid a lack of evidence.

[...]

The files disclosed today also show that American military commanders implicitly acknowledged that dozens of people were incorrectly captured and sent to Guantanamo.

[...]

An analysis of the Guantanamo files shows that at least 150 people were assessed by the Americans as innocent and released.

Is our intelligence community that inept or are they determined to keep GitMo occupied to give the false sense that progress is being made in this “war on terror”? What’s more, the “mastermind of 9/11″ and the man who supposedly revealed the location of bin Laden has openly stated that he has given multitudes of false information to stop the torture. If you’re interested you can read the ICRC report that mentions this here.

Obama even goes so far to claim that he directed the operation which resulted in a “firefight”. Furthermore, he claims they took care not to kill civilians, which they did. The firefight part is especially absurd as there was only one armed person present and he wasn’t even in the house in which bin Laden was supposedly residing.

He also claims that they worked with Pakistan in the operation, which they didn’t.

He then goes on to attempt to tug on some more heart strings by talking about wounded and killed service members as if he wasn’t using them as pawns in the great American Imperial Empire. It really makes me sick how he pretends to care about Americans while sending more into Afghanistan to be killed for no reason. He then continues to use the 9/11 card in order to raise emotions and distract from the constant lies.

While the White House continuously changes their story we in the reality based community continue to stick to ours. No modification is needed when you tell nothing but the truth, and the whole truth, so help me God.

Top Search Terms Used to Find This Page:

• obama lies
• Obama telling lies in front of his teleprompter
• psyop radio products