Monsanto: dealers in death and destruction

By David Noble, writer for End the Lie

The Monsanto Company is the leading producer of herbicide glyphosate and genetically engineered seeds. The company was founded in St Louis, Missouri in 1901 by John Francis Queeny, a 30 year veteran of the pharmaceutical industry. They have a long and dirty history of polluting the planet despite their claims that they are working to reduce environmental destruction and feed the world with their genetically engineered crops.

Their sordid history includes being sued as one of the companies behind Agent Orange which was used in Vietnam from 1962 to 1970. The US military sprayed 72 million litres of herbicides mostly Agent Orange in the Vietnam War. Over one Million Vietnamese along with over 100,000 American and allied troops were known to be effected. The effects of Agent Orange are still being felt in Vietnam today. By 1983, 9170 veterans had filed claims for disabilities that they claimed were because of the use of Agent Orange. Their claims for compensation were denied by the VA because they said that the only side effect of this toxic chemical was a facial rash. This ruling was reached despite Agent Orange being accepted internationally as one of the most toxic chemicals on the planet. This chemical is recognized as causing everything from severe birth defects, cancer, neurological disorders and death.

Monsanto has a long history of lying and falsifying records to protect their interests. In 2002 Vietnam requested assistance in dealing with tens of thousands of birth defects due to Agent Orange. But Monsanto in order to avoid medical compensation expenses continued to claim that this now banned chemical was not toxic.

Despite their claims that they are working to reduce environmental destruction, Monsanto in fact have a long history of doing the exact opposite. By 1940 they had begun to focus on plastics and synthetic fabrics like polystyrene (still widely used in food packaging and other consumer products), which is ranked fifth in the EPA’s 1980s listing of chemicals whose production generates the most total hazardous waste. Another example is that during World War 11 Monsanto played a significant role in the Manhattan Project to develop the atom bomb. After the war they then championed the use of chemical pesticides in agriculture. It is no coincidence that with the increased usage of these pesticides there has been a significant and worrying decline in the bee population. This is backed up by claims that four European countries bee populations have soared since banning this poison.

If these pesticides really are behind the decline of the bee population this is indeed serious as bees don’t just make honey, but are in fact responsible for pollinating 90% of the plants grown.

Monsanto were at it again in the1970s when they began manufacturing the herbicide Roundup. The key ingredient is glyphosate, which is known to be a highly toxic poison for animals and humans. Despite this it was marketed as a safe, general-purpose herbicide for widespread commercial and consumer use. In 1997 Monsanto was taken to court and forced to stop claiming that Roundup was “biodegradable” and “environmentally friendly. Further proof of the corruption of this company is the fact that they have been repeatedly fined and ruled against. Some instances of this include mislabelling containers of Roundup, failing to report health data to EPA, and chemical spills and improper chemical deposition.

In 1995, Monsanto ranked fifth among US corporations in the US Toxic Release Inventory, having discharged 37 million pounds of toxic chemicals into the air, land, water and underground. Interestingly hundreds of millions of dollars have been spent on funding Monsanto’s Roundup herbicides in Colombia by the US. This Roundup has been known to be applied in concentrations 26 times higher than what is recommended for agricultural use.

In 1985 Monsanto once again showed their lack of concern over health issues when they purchased G.D. Searle, the company that held the patent to aspartame, the active ingredient in NutraSweet. Aspartame in fact would be banned if not for Donald Rumsfeld who used his influence to get it approved. This was despite a 1980 FDA Board of Inquiry, comprised of three independent scientists finding it unsafe as it “might induce brain tumors. Monsanto have repeatedly shown that they won’t let health concerns get in the way of them making a profit.

They are also one of the five major corporations controlling GMO production. The list of problems with GMOs is nearly endless. Despite claims of being the miracle cure for hunger, it actually has destroyed farmer’s livelihoods and freedom through patent monopolies and creation of dependency on non-renewable seeds. GM crops are also bad for the environment as they increase the need for chemicals since they create super weeds and super pests. Questions must also be asked of the health issues associated with GMOs. Some of these foods have been proven in laboratory tests to cause: cancer, sterility, miscarriages, seizures and even death!

India has been used as a testing ground for genetically modified crops which has resulted in 125,000+ small farmer suicides in the last decade. These farmers were promised previously unheard of harvests and income if they switched to GM crops. What they ended up with is mounting debt caused by the poor yields, increased need for pesticides, and the higher cost of the Bt cotton seed sold by Monsanto.

Corporations like Monsanto are trying to create a monopoly with the products they produce. They also seem to get a lot of help from those in power. Clearance was given to Monsanto in 2002 for commercial planting of Bt cotton just a few months after the government had ordered the burning of Bt cotton on 10,000 acres of land in Gujarat. This serves as proof of the corruption and support these corporations receive in their quest to have complete control over the products we use.

Monsanto has also been involved in the aggressive promotion of synthetic Bovine Growth Hormone, approved by the FDA for commercial sale in 1994. This was despite strong concerns about its safety. In their attempt to have total control of the market they have even sued small dairy companies that advertised their products as free of the artificial hormone.

Many farmers have also found themselves being sued after their crops were contaminated from seeds blown over from a neighbouring farm. These seeds would be the last thing that any farmer not growing GM crops would want. But Monsanto doesn’t see it that way and sues them for patent infringement. The simple fact is that pollination and wind drifts occur. There is no way that farmers can stop this from happening. Farmers have had to endure Monsanto trespassing on their land and examining their crops in an effort to find some of their patented crops. If any is found they then sue for the whole crop. But recently this has changed with a group of fed up farmers suing Monsanto over their GMO seeds. The case is titled Organic Seed Growers & Trade Association, et al. v. Monsanto and was filed in federal district court in Manhattan. This case asks whether Monsanto has the right to sue organic farmers for patent infringement if Monsanto’s transgenic seed should land on their property.

Monsanto’s history is one of corruption and polluting the planet. A perfect example of this is that in 1991 they were fined $1.2 million for trying to conceal discharge of contaminated waste water into the Mystic River in Connecticut.  The aim of Monsanto is clear; they want to control our food chain and what we grow. They want to make sure the only food available will come from them, And that no price is considered too high to pay. Do we really want corporations like Monsanto controlling what we eat and grow?

Top Search Terms Used to Find This Page:

One Response to Monsanto: dealers in death and destruction

  1. Len Aldis December 6, 2011 at 2:51 AM

    December 2011

    An Open Letter to Shareholders of Monsanto.

    As you prepare to study the various resolutions for the coming annual general meeting of your company, being held in St Louis 24th January 2012, I ask you to take into consideration the history of your company and the policies you have supported at various annual general meetings.

    It is a record that very few can be proud of. For example, can you as a shareholder be proud, even satisfied, that your company has been responsible for the deaths of many thousands of Vietnamese, many thousands of abnormal births in Vietnam, and today in Vietnam due to the product manufactured by your company, you have left four million Vietnamese suffering from various illnesses and deformities, and thousands of acres of once magnificent forests destroyed. The product was of course Agent Orange.

    At the time you attend the shareholders meeting it will be fifty-one-years ago that Agent Orange was first sprayed over Southern areas of Vietnam, 10th August 1961. It is well recorded by international scientists and researchers from a number of countries – and includes the US – what the effects of Agent Orange has had on the people and land of Vietnam.

    There has been and continues to be massive information about the effects of Agent Orange, and not only on the Vietnamese, ask the Vietnam Veterans from the US, Australia, New Zealand, and South Korea, who served in Vietnam, for many of them were also affected by Agent Orange. Many of these veterans are still campaigning in their respective countries for their illnesses to be recognised by their Government as being related to Agent Orange. Yes, it is a fact that not all the US veterans have been accepted as suffering from Agent Orange. Many have died, as have others, denied a pension or compensation for serving their country.

    Their relatives could be amongst the many outside the annual general meeting on 24th January seeking answers to the questions they want to raise with your Chairman Mr Hugh Grant and members of your board. You will see them when you walk into the meeting. Please do not avoid them, but stop and listen to their questions, and please answer if you can.

    Let me remind you that eighty-million litres of Agent Orange was sprayed on Southern Vietnam and this was carried out over a period of ten-years. And your company has for these fifty-one years refused to accept responsibility and has also refused to make any compensation to the Vietnamese. The word Sorry has not come from the lips of your Chairman, not has one cent come from the $billions of profit made from Agent Orange indeed, it has been you the shareholder that has benefited, in the dividends you have received over the years.

    Perhaps among you at the AGM will be Bill and Melinda Gates, it would be interesting to hear if they make any statement that they are satisfied with the record of your company, having purchased 500,000 shares. Perhaps they will seek to ask how they can help Monsanto in its campaign to increase its sales of GM Seeds world-wide, another Monsanto product that has cost the lives of thousands of Indian Farmers who were forced into debt through the failure of their GM crops. And outside the meeting will be American farmers who do not want GM Seeds but a number of them have been taken to court by your company to protect its sales and in turn its profits and your dividends. Are you really proud of your company, one that has cost so many lives, has ruined the lives of so many others in many countries?

    I hope you will consider the content of this letter, written by a person who has travelled to Vietnam for the past twenty-years and has seen the horrors of the legacy your company Monsanto has left to the people and land.

    In my years of travelling there I have seen babies, youngsters, teenagers and adults crippled and in many cases minus limbs, eyes etc through being affected by Agent Orange. Remember also this: the Vietnamese affected and aged under forty-years, would have been born after the spraying ended in 1971 and amongst them are the fourth generation. So the suffering continues, generation after generation after generation, that is the legacy your company has brought on the people of Vietnam.

    So, when it comes to cast your votes, for who, and for what, will you vote?

    Len Aldis. Chairman
    Agent Orange Action Group

    Flat 2, 26 Tomlins Grove
    London E3 4NX

    [email protected]
    http://www.aoag.org

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

CommentLuv badge

End the Lie allows you to put your keywords with your name if you have had 9 approved comments. Use your real name and then @ your keywords (maximum of 3)

Advertise on End the Lie


Would you like to have your business or service exposed to thousands of people every day here at End the Lie? We have a wide variety of options available all at unbeatable prices. At the same time you will be supporting a truth-oriented alternative news outlet as well as hardworking independent journalists across the United States and the world.

If you would like to know more please email us and please be sure to include the details of what you are advertising, what your budget is and what type of advertising format you are looking for, including size(s), length of advertising period and any other pertinent details. The more information you give us, the more accurate the quote will be. We might also be able to work out some unique advertising tailored to your needs so feel free to contact us with questions and ideas.

Note: our advertisers have absolutely no input in what we cover or how we cover it. If this is problematic, you might want to seek out another news outlet. Here at End the Lie we put the truth first and thus no sponsor will be able to control our content. We reserve the right to refuse service to anyone and we will not advertise pornography or anything which might otherwise be illegal.