Russian Foreign Minister issues grave warning to Israel and the West

By End the Lie

Sergei Lavrov, Russian Foreign Minister (Photo: Mikhail Evstafiev)

Israel and the West’s rhetoric has been – to put it lightly – heated when it comes to Iran and it has only intensified over recent days and weeks.

The Russian Foreign Minister, Sergei Lavrov, issued a grim warning to Israel, the United States and the United Kingdom, which have all reportedly been weighing an unprovoked strike on Iran.

Lavrov said that taking military action against Iran would be a “very serious mistake fraught with unpredictable consequences”.

Indeed the consequences would be unpredictable to a degree, yet predictable in that the fallout would be far from positive for the region and the world.

This comes directly after Israeli President Shimon Peres made some grim statements on the Iran situation himself.

“The possibility of a military attack against Iran is now closer to being applied than the application of a diplomatic option”, Peres said to Hayom, an Israeli news agency.

Yet Peres claims that the decision has not already been made, but the IAEA’s report due to be released tomorrow will likely be a deciding factor.

Leaked information I covered in this article purportedly shows that Iran is indeed pursuing a nuclear weapons program despite their fervent denials and the IAEA report will allegedly show proof of their weapons program.

Echoing the constant denials of any military applications to their nuclear program, Iranian Foreign Minister Ali Akbar Salehi said the evidence against them has been contrived and is part of a large-scale smear campaign against Iran.

This is not wholly improbable given that Israel has been claiming that Iran wants to wipe them off the map for years now and neocon elements in the United States and throughout the West openly support such action.

Russia holds the position that the only way to solve this problem – be it real or perceived – is through six-party talks that include both Iran and Russia which had broken down in December of last year.

“[T]he only path for removing concerns is to create every possible condition” to resume the six-party talks, said Lavrov.

Lavrov seems to be a voice of reason, urging diplomacy in an age of saber rattling and warmongering.

Yet the Western media continues to promote the claims made by anonymous diplomats who claim that the IAEA report to be issued tomorrow will include evidence that Iran has developed computer simulations of a nuclear warhead and satellite images which allegedly show a steel container used for tests related to nuclear weaponry.

Last time I checked creating a computer simulation isn’t a breach of international law and a non-descript steel container is far from the ironclad proof one would hope to get before authorizing a preemptive strike.

Then again, as I covered in this article, the intelligence leading into Iraq was just as questionable and based on alleged mobile laboratories and other fantastical claims of a program seeking weapons of mass destruction (WMDs) which obviously failed to materialize.

One anonymous Western diplomat told Reuters, “There are bits of it [the IAEA report] which clearly can only be used for clandestine nuclear purposes. It is a compelling case.”

One of these “bits” is likely going to be the underground facility near Qoms which is far from a menacing facility as I previously reported.

Even if it housed nuclear weapons, it would represent a second strike capability. However, there is no proof to show that it does house nuclear weapons or that Iran is even seeking such weapons.

Iran is likely just trying to shield their peaceful nuclear program from a warmongering Israel that bombed Syria in 2007 for simply seeking to develop a nuclear reactor.

The preemptive unilateral Israeli strike on Syria known as “Operation Orchard” and it resulted in the alleged deaths of 10 North Korean workers.

The U.S. government and the Israelis of course insisted that the nuclear facility in the Deir ez-Zor region of Syria had military applications but, just like Iran, Syria denies the allegations completely.

The IAEA later said that the site was indeed a nuclear reactor but the military nature of the site was not verified.

The IAEA claims it is because the Syrians wouldn’t provide the necessary levels of cooperation but the Syrians have also disputed this allegation.

Could the intelligence presented in the IAEA report tomorrow be just as unreliable and unsubstantiated as that used to push America into invading Iraq?

What are the consequences Lavrov spoke of? Could he be implying that a strike against Iran would bring about World War 3?

I would love to hear what you think and if you have any information or intelligence to share please do not hesitate to email me at [email protected]

12 Responses to Russian Foreign Minister issues grave warning to Israel and the West

  1. Liberty November 7, 2011 at 7:59 PM

    I hope Russia would actually back up Iran if they were attacked. So many countries pretend to stand against Israel (Turkey) but never actually do

    Reply
  2. Anonymous November 7, 2011 at 8:15 PM

    maybe he means israhell will get what it deserves

    Reply
  3. Charles Crosby November 8, 2011 at 12:04 PM

    If our corrupt and treacherous Vatican/Rothschild puppet governments do take us into another unlawful war lets hope it wakes up a few deluded morons in Britain and America, and soon, before it’s too late.

    How many of these satanic conflicts have to occur before the numb skull proles and plebs wake up? Unbelievable!!!

    Reply
    • antoine p November 8, 2011 at 6:02 PM

      israel should destroy its own nucs, before asking iran or any other country not to built one,because of israel the whole world will burn and that will make the backers of israel happy,but they have to know that, they are living in the same world ,america and the americans are suffering and dying for the sake of israel,i would like to dye for america,not for israel or any other country, all the suffering we have in america happens for the sake of israel,

      Reply
      • Anonymous November 9, 2011 at 3:32 AM

        Isn’treal should destroy itself.

        Reply
  4. stienster November 9, 2011 at 4:35 AM

    Let’s keep FACTS in mind. Let’s publish them. Let’s name the countries which Iran has bombed or aggressively occupied in the last century. hmmmmm…. I’m drawing a blank… Can anyone name a country that Iran has aggressively attacked in the past 100 years?- I can’t.

    Now let’s see which countries HAVE consistantly waged wars of aggression build on lies and disinformation and speculation: USA, Israel, all NATO countries, Russia, China, India, Pakistan, Iraq. I’m sure I’ve forgotten some.

    Where is Iran on this list?- And, could ANYONE in their RIGHT MIND blame Iran IF they were in fact working to develope weapons of any kind??

    It’s time we sane people go and OCCUPY THE PENTAGON- whatever it takes to STOP THE WAR EMPIRE, before it destroys the entire Earth and it’s inhabitants. Just in case you’re confused, the “war empire” DOESN’T INCLUDE IRAN.

    Reply
    • ReasonResonating November 9, 2011 at 10:34 AM

      Iran is against western interests; they instill hatred for the west and fund terrorist organizations that have attacked American and Western targets.
      If you were right and “War” was not in Iran’s interests they would not be funding terror proxy in Afghanistan, Lebanon, Syria and Israel, they would not deny nuclear proposals presented by the west and Russia and they would not promote violence against the west. But Iran does do all these things, and thus they are perusing a path that will only lead to their own destruction.

      Reply
      • Redc November 10, 2011 at 12:07 AM

        So can we assume from your comment that if they don’t play ball like we want them to, if they don’t behave like the rest of the world in our western image, if they don’t accept our view of what we think life should be like, we should bomb them to hell? And while we threaten all of that, they should do nothing to defend themselves against our obvious world-ruling intentions. They should just bend over and take it and at the same time be polite and hand over all their beautiful natural resources so that we can stuff ourselves upon it? BTW, I bet you can provide a million MSM articles as proof of your claims that they Soooo hate us that they’re doing behind the scenes funding of dubious activities to threaten our gluttonous way of life in our pigsty. Pot call kettle black, perhaps? Guess when we do undercover deceptions, we’re playing fair. WAKE UP

        Reply
      • Charles Crosby November 10, 2011 at 5:57 AM

        What ever we do, we must must protect western interests. Whatever they are. What brainwashed resonating hasn’t told us is which members of this western interest group he is referring to. I know who they are, I wonder if he/she does?

        Interesting, too, that the US has 300 years supply of oil, at least, i.e. the US is self sufficient in oil, so why does the US import oil?

        Reply
  5. Pat Riot November 12, 2011 at 4:33 PM

    I read somewhere else, that the source of the computer is unknown, and that the plans found on the computer are for a missile developed by North Korea, which in 1990, Iran had dropped the program.

    Reply
  6. LILLY November 13, 2011 at 2:57 PM

    WW-3===EVERY GOVT ON THE PLANET HAS WARNED O=BOMB-A, UK CAM-ROTTON, AND JEW GUY -NETANYAHU NOT TO ATTACK IRAN……..AND DONT WORRY THEY WIL NOT LISTEN!!….EVER!!

    THEY ARE HELL BENT TO COMPLETE THE ROTHSCHILDS PLANNED NEW WORLD ORDER PLANS AND AGENDAS BY STEALTH !!!

    TO REDUCE THE POPULATIONS ON EARTH AND BRING IN THEIR ONE WORLD GOVT GOVERNED BY THE UNITED NAITONS…!! AND THEM!!

    ……DONT BELIEVE IT?????? ……THEN WAKE THE HELL UP!!

    AND START PAYING ATTENTION!! NOW!!……..

    WE MUST TAKE BACK OUR NATIONS FROM THESE FASCIST ELITE GLOBALISTS!! OR FACE WW-3!!

    OH YES WE MUST ACT NOW OR FACE WW-3 ON OUR DOOR STEPS!
    VERY SOON!!

    Reply
    • Charles Crosby November 14, 2011 at 6:33 AM

      WW3 began as soon as, if not before, WW2 ended. WW4 is what you’re probably referring to.

      Out of interest, what plans do you have for taking back our nations apart from shouting at people in block caps?

      Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

Advertise on End the Lie

Would you like to have your business or service exposed to thousands of people every day here at End the Lie? We have a wide variety of options available all at unbeatable prices. At the same time you will be supporting a truth-oriented alternative news outlet as well as hardworking independent journalists across the United States and the world.

If you would like to know more please email us and please be sure to include the details of what you are advertising, what your budget is and what type of advertising format you are looking for, including size(s), length of advertising period and any other pertinent details. The more information you give us, the more accurate the quote will be. We might also be able to work out some unique advertising tailored to your needs so feel free to contact us with questions and ideas.

Note: our advertisers have absolutely no input in what we cover or how we cover it. If this is problematic, you might want to seek out another news outlet. Here at End the Lie we put the truth first and thus no sponsor will be able to control our content. We reserve the right to refuse service to anyone and we will not advertise pornography, gambling, drugs, alcohol, tobacco or anything that might otherwise be illegal.