Why does the U.S. want a total media blackout on long-term Afghan deal?

By Madison Ruppert

Editor of End the Lie

Loya jirga spokeswoman Safia Sediqi

During a press conference yesterday, Safia Sediqi, loya jirga (which in the Pashto language means “grand council”) spokeswoman, said that Washington wants a complete media blackout over the conditions set forth in the new strategic long-term deal with Afghanistan, according to Press TV and BBC Persian.

Called by Afghan President Hamid Karzai, the loya jirga began in the Afghan capital of Kabul on Wednesday and will run for four days.

The discussion will focus on the Afghan-American relationship, specifically the possibility of long-term American basis on Afghan soil after the U.S.-led coalition forces are supposedly going to withdraw in 2014.

Both political and religious figures in Afghanistan have been vocal in their opposition to American plans for long-lasting or very possibly permanent military bases on sovereign Afghan territory.

As I previously reported, the people of Afghanistan are increasingly seeing the foreign troops as occupying forces that are not protecting their security, which is reflected in the utter failure that the decade-long battle in Afghanistan has been.

As Press TV points out, the U.S. has not met its goals after 10 years and the security situation is abysmal despite nearly 150,000 U.S.-led foreign troops deployed around the nation.

The state-funded BBC Persian news network reports that the most common complain amongst loya jirga participants is that they have not beed provided with information about the terms and conditions of the long-term deal.

Sharifullah Sahak, an Afghan employee of The New York Times covering Kabul and provinces said via Twitter just four hours ago at the time of writing, “Loya Jirga members with different views saying government should sign the strategic pact for 10, 20, even for 50 years with US.”

Interestingly, according to Kuwait Times, Karzai assured both Russia and China that a long-term deal with the United States would not affect their ties to Afghanistan.

This is important due to the U.S. possibly goading China in the South China Sea dispute and the significant impact a sustained American military presence in Afghanistan would have on any Chinese-American relations in the future.

Karzai stipulated that if the United States ceased night raids and disbanded international bodies like the combined civilian-military reconstruction teams that play a governmental role, they would be prepared to allow U.S. troops in Afghanistan in the long-term.

He stated that they will allow military interests because he claims it is in Afghanistan’s benefit, which is highly questionable, at best.

It definitely didn’t benefit Iraq and it hasn’t benefitted Afghanistan thus far, barring the American war profiteers that make a killing off of the neo-colonialist occupation.

He claimed that “money will come to us” but this is also highly suspect, as a great deal of money, $31-60 billion (which is likely a conservative estimate seeing as it was investigated by the government Commission on Wartime Contracting) to be precise, has been “lost to waste and fraud” in both Afghanistan and Iraq.

The Taliban has stated that those supporting the sustained American presence in Afghanistan will be treated as “traitors” who are “deserving of harsh penalties,” according to Kuwait Times.

The major question that remains unanswered is why the American government wants a media blackout on the conditions of the deal.

Any situation in which a government attempts to or succeeds in creating a media blackout should, in my opinion, be treated with a great deal of interest.

Hopefully more information will unfold in the coming days as the loya jirga continues, that is, unless Washington succeeds in creating a total media blackout in which case we will only be able to wait and see while hoping for leaks.

Top Search Terms Used to Find This Page:

One Response to Why does the U.S. want a total media blackout on long-term Afghan deal?

  1. Andie November 18, 2011 at 6:30 PM

    the media blackouts mean there is something VERY shady/bad going on, please investigate this for more info if you can i will email you anything i can find

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

CommentLuv badge

End the Lie allows you to put your keywords with your name if you have had 9 approved comments. Use your real name and then @ your keywords (maximum of 3)

Advertise on End the Lie


Would you like to have your business or service exposed to thousands of people every day here at End the Lie? We have a wide variety of options available all at unbeatable prices. At the same time you will be supporting a truth-oriented alternative news outlet as well as hardworking independent journalists across the United States and the world.

If you would like to know more please email us and please be sure to include the details of what you are advertising, what your budget is and what type of advertising format you are looking for, including size(s), length of advertising period and any other pertinent details. The more information you give us, the more accurate the quote will be. We might also be able to work out some unique advertising tailored to your needs so feel free to contact us with questions and ideas.

Note: our advertisers have absolutely no input in what we cover or how we cover it. If this is problematic, you might want to seek out another news outlet. Here at End the Lie we put the truth first and thus no sponsor will be able to control our content. We reserve the right to refuse service to anyone and we will not advertise pornography or anything which might otherwise be illegal.