Cop gets written reprimand for turning off recording equipment when brutally assaulting 66-year-old man with dementia

By End the Lie

Officer Middendorf beating Flowers after kicking him to the ground as captured on the video recording equipment Middendorf attempted to disable before brutally assaulting Flowers

In yet another disturbing display of how police seem to be immune from responsibility for their criminal behavior, it has been revealed that a police officer in Melbourne, Florida turned off his patrol car’s recording equipment before beating a man “for no apparent reason.”

To make matters worse, if such a thing is even possible when dealing with a violent crime like this, the man was actually suffering from dementia and was 66-years-old.

This reminds me of another troubling case – also in Florida, and also dealing with a man over 60 years of age – the murder of Nick Christie.

In the case of Christie, the officers responsible for his tortuous death were cleared of all wrongdoing, and in the case of Albert Flowers, Officer Derek Middendorf was merely reprimanded.

Middendorf was not in fact reprimanded for beating an old man with dementia, in fact WFTV reports, “The only disciplinary record the officer received for the incident was a written reprimand for turning off the recording equipment.”

You may watch the raw video of the incident here, although I believe it to be unnecessary as it is so disturbing that the written description gets across the horror of it all well enough and I advise against watching it due to the truly graphic nature and how psychologically damaging such images can  be.

Apparently the police now only have a problem with unwarranted violence against senior citizens when it isn’t recorded. Otherwise, it seems absolutely acceptable to them.

Before the beating occurred, Middendorf turned off his audio and video capturing equipment, a clear sign that he knew what he was about to do was not only wrong, but illegal.

The police department was later able to extract the video from the hard drive, but the audio was not recoverable.

The video shows Middendorf kicking Flowers in his stomach, then, while Flowers is on the ground, Middendorf repeatedly punched him, supposedly because Flowers was walking towards Middendorf in an aggressive manner.

This laughable justification is far too often utilized – or at least attempts are made at such – to explain brutal assaults against vulnerable persons at the hand of those who are supposed to protect and serve.

An example that springs to mind is the incident at the University of California, Davis, where a police officer attacked a group of young people with a chemical weapon (pepper spray) who were doing nothing more than sitting on the ground with their arms linked at their sides.

Later they attempted to claim that the officers were surrounded and feeling threatened, thus the use of force was justified.

This is similar to what Middendorf is claiming, although in this case he is saying that Flowers was moving towards him rapidly an “an aggressive manner” and Middendorf couldn’t tell if he had a knife in his hands.

This is like a cop claiming he was justified in beating down a child with a large jacked because the cop couldn’t tell if the child had an assault rifle under the jacket.

Sure, you can’t tell, but what leads you to assume that this individual would not only be carrying a weapon but using it against a police officer?

There is some justification for his concern that Flowers might have a knife, as the officer was reportedly called to the scene after an employee called the police because Flowers allegedly brandished a knife during an argument surrounding money.

The glaring problem with this justification is that when the police actually arrived the family said that the issue had been resolved and Flowers in fact never pulled a knife at all.

Garrick Flowers, the victim’s nephew, was present at the scene and says that he asked the officer to stop and informed Middendorf that his uncle has dementia.

“He’s 66-years-old, he had a triple bypass, I think he’s killing him,” Garrick Flowers said.

Flowers’ family said that Middendorf was choking the aging man and the recovered footage shows another police officer attacking Flowers in the face with a taser.

The family said as a result of the brutal assault Flowers was hospitalized for nearly a month.

The situation gets even more troubling when one considers the fact that not only was Middendorf merely reprimanded, but Flowers – the victim in this unfortunate debacle – was actually charged with battery on a law enforcement officer.

However, it is now being reported that prosecutors are saying they have reduced his charges “to a misdemeanor of resisting an officer without violence,” although to any rational person it is still an egregious injustice.

Under no circumstances is it acceptable for a human being to be brutally beaten and then not only is the attacker let off scot-free but to make matters even more ludicrous, the victim is charged with a crime.

This is simply unacceptable and hopefully the viral nature of this story will help pressure the prosecutors handling the case into not only removing all charges from flowers but actually charging Middendorf himself with assault.

Attorney Paul Bross summed up the absurdity of this case quite aptly and simply in saying, “It’s ridiculous.”

“Clearly from this video there was no assault on a law enforcement officer. We asked for a speedy trial. We want a jury to see this video,” Bross said.

Indeed, it is only logical to note that if Flowers was in fact a threat or Middendorf thought he might have a legitimate reason to use force, Middendorf would in fact want the audio and video recording.

This could only serve to help Middendorf and insure him against any false claims of police brutality.

But when Middendorf turned off the equipment – like far too many other officers who become hostile when being recorded and thus held accountable for their actions – he made it clear that he was well aware what he was about to do was wrong.

The police chief was not able to comment on the matter to WFTV on the excessive force allegations because he said he had yet to review the complaint, which was just filed on Friday.

I sincerely hope that Flowers will see some justice in this case, unlike Christie, who has a distraught wife who has been seeking justice ever since the horrific event occurred to no avail.

It is a grim statement of the times to have to do this, but at least we can say that Flowers wasn’t killed by the officer, unlike Christie who was not so lucky.

UPDATE: According to Raw Story:

Charges against Flowers were dropped by the Brevard County State Attorney’s Office after they learned about his dementia.

Middendorf was initially reprimanded for tampering with the recording device, but the city chose not pursue an administrative review at the time.

“Information regarding the arrest of Albert Flowers was sufficient to indicate that an internal investigation was not warranted,” Melbourne Police Chief Steve Mimbs said in a press advisory before the video was released publicly. “Officer Derek Middendorf is a valued officer whose record since joining the department in 2005 reflects the fact that he has done a very good job for the city.”

Top Search Terms Used to Find This Page:

13 Responses to Cop gets written reprimand for turning off recording equipment when brutally assaulting 66-year-old man with dementia

  1. america? January 16, 2012 at 9:39 PM

    what the hell is going on in this country? since when is this what we’re about?

    Reply
    • Anonymous January 16, 2012 at 9:55 PM

      No doubt…very disturbing and its getting more widespread.

      Reply
    • James January 20, 2013 at 10:00 AM

      This is what we are about since BushCo and Company false flagged us on 9/11.

      Also, our warped-out troops are now “serving” in police departments all over the country. Many of these troops are badly broken and are simply applying what they learned in pacification operations overseas.

      Reply
  2. Angel Collins January 16, 2012 at 10:49 PM

    More and more tragic incidents are happening all around the world and I believe that this is one of those. I totally agree with you that if the officer really thought that Flowers had a knife with him, he should’ve not turned off the audio and video recording. Poor Flowers. We should not support rude acts towards elderly.

    Reply
  3. Anonymous January 16, 2012 at 11:57 PM

    I just watched the video

    im nearly crying.

    Reply
  4. Liberty January 17, 2012 at 9:15 PM

    totally speechless.

    Reply
  5. xmark January 18, 2012 at 2:37 PM

    well , thas standard procedure in america isnt it . and nobody ever does anything about it , so it will only get worse. oh they will say something about my comment attatude, but not the real problem.

    Reply
  6. Anonymous January 25, 2012 at 3:54 AM

    what a wonderful country we live in!

    Reply
  7. Johm January 30, 2012 at 2:37 PM

    I will not visit Florida anymore.

    Reply
    • James January 20, 2013 at 10:05 AM

      Florida has been borked up for quite a while.

      We have a reform school that was torturing and murdering students. It only took decades after the revelations to shut it down.

      We have guards at a Sheriff’s boot camp that beat a 14 year old boy to death. And then they walk away scot-free.

      We have seriously messed up police and too many events to count. The character of Florida has changed completely over the last 40 years.

      Reply
  8. Mindy March 26, 2012 at 7:07 AM

    Those recording devices are there for a reason…they can convict or exonerate. This “officer”, by turning off the device, announced his intention(s) to commit a crime. Turning off the recording device should, at the very least, have resulted in a formal reprimand and at the most dismissal from the force. Period, no exceptions. Then this so-called officer should have been arrested, charged and tried for assault. Noone is above the law…noone!

    Reply
  9. Marc Lizotte September 1, 2012 at 6:44 PM

    The nephew that was w/ the man who got beaten (which was wrong) SHOULD have spoke up for his uncle BEFORE the Officer felt he was being moved on aggresively. He should have told his Uncle to stay back and that he would handle it. Think about this folks, your gonna let your demented uncle speak for himself, come on!

    Reply
  10. Clyde September 2, 2012 at 7:06 AM

    Hoping for Justice is a delusion that many poor Americans hang onto, even in the face of the naked aggression that has been and is being carried out against us. It is an apartheid, or one sided relationship with a legal fiction called government that Americans need to cope with. Unless all Americans are willing to uphold and defend the Rights articulated in our Constitution, there can be no justice. The exercise of the 2nd amendment would eliminate the need for a labor union of thugs called police.
    I know of no other way to free ourselves from tyranny, than to fight back, because they will show no mercy, and they will extol their lies in the “official” record.

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

Advertise on End the Lie

Would you like to have your business or service exposed to thousands of people every day here at End the Lie? We have a wide variety of options available all at unbeatable prices. At the same time you will be supporting a truth-oriented alternative news outlet as well as hardworking independent journalists across the United States and the world.

If you would like to know more please email us and please be sure to include the details of what you are advertising, what your budget is and what type of advertising format you are looking for, including size(s), length of advertising period and any other pertinent details. The more information you give us, the more accurate the quote will be. We might also be able to work out some unique advertising tailored to your needs so feel free to contact us with questions and ideas.

Note: our advertisers have absolutely no input in what we cover or how we cover it. If this is problematic, you might want to seek out another news outlet. Here at End the Lie we put the truth first and thus no sponsor will be able to control our content. We reserve the right to refuse service to anyone and we will not advertise pornography, gambling, drugs, alcohol, tobacco or anything that might otherwise be illegal.