Harvard study: evidence shows ‘fluoride may adversely affect cognitive development in children’

By Madison Ruppert

Editor of End the Lie

Despite a history of the criticism of water fluoridation being characterized as “scare mongering via crazy water fluoridation conspiracy theories,” a study conducted by the Harvard School of Public Health (HSPH) and China Medical University in Shenyang, combining 27 other studies, “found strong indications that fluoride may adversely affect cognitive development in children.”

Hilariously, some actually go as far as to claim, “almost all health and dental organizations support the fluoridation of water or have found no association with adverse effects with water fluoridation,” which is clearly untrue.

The study, which was actually a systematic review of other studies, was published on July 20, 2012 in Environmental Health Perspectives and mostly relied on research from China.

The researchers focused on fluoride’s interaction with the developing human brain since public health experts have so far been unable to come to a consensus on the safety of fluoridated drinking water consumption in children.

However, it has been established that “extremely high levels” of fluoride cause neurotoxicity in adults. Furthermore, negative impacts on learning and memory have been found in rodent studies, much like high-fructose corn syrup.

While proponents of water fluoridation regularly like to claim that there is plenty of science backing up the practice, according to Anna Choi, lead author of the study and research scientist in the Department of Environmental Health at HSPH, “Virtually no human studies in this field have been conducted in the U.S.”

Therefore, the researchers relied on Chinese studies since, according to HSPH’s press release, “exposures to the chemical are increased in some parts of China,” and the risks of fluoride have been well documented there.

Yet the researchers had to contend with the fact that some of the studies on children in China differed in various ways or were incomplete. This forced the authors to take care in data compilation and analysis in order to properly assess the potential risk of fluoride use.

“For the first time we have been able to do a comprehensive meta-analysis that has the potential for helping us plan better studies,” said Choi. “We want to make sure that cognitive development is considered as a possible target for fluoride toxicity.”

While the studies might have had some difficulties, the conclusions drawn by Choi and senior author and adjunct professor of environmental health at HSPH, Philippe Grandjean, seem to be quite clear.

Grandjean and Choi collated the various epidemiological studies of children who had been exposed to fluoridated drinking water and the China National Knowledge Infrastructure was also leveraged to find studies published in Chinese journals.

The authors then analyzed the relationship between fluoride exposure and IQ measures in over 8,000 children age 14 and below.

They discovered that in every study but one, highly fluoridated drinking water was linked to problems in cognitive development.

That being said, the average loss was not as significant as some might expect. Averaged out, the loss was only half of a single IQ point, yet some studies indicated that even a slight increase in fluoride exposure could indeed be toxic to the brain.

The researchers further observed that children raised in areas with high fluoride content did, in fact, have significantly lower IQ scores than children who lived in areas with low fluoride.

The authors believe that the toxic effects of fluoride on brain development may have occurred long before the time the children were studied and that the brain may not be able to fully compensate for the toxic effects.

“Fluoride seems to fit in with lead, mercury, and other poisons that cause chemical brain drain,” Grandjean says. “The effect of each toxicant may seem small, but the combined damage on a population scale can be serious, especially because the brain power of the next generation is crucial to all of us.”

Personally, I find these statements to be nothing short of astounding. Usually we see fluoride being supported and touted, especially when discussing water fluoridation. These researchers, however, are presenting a much different picture, highlighting the fact that the cumulative damage of all of these toxicants is much more serious than some may want us to  believe.

Did I forget anything or miss any errors? Would you like to make me aware of a story or subject to cover? Or perhaps you want to bring your writing to a wider audience? Feel free to contact me at [email protected] with your concerns, tips, questions, original writings, insults or just about anything that may strike your fancy.

Please support our work and help us start to pay contributors by doing your shopping through our Amazon link or check out some must-have products at our store.

Top Search Terms Used to Find This Page:

5 Responses to Harvard study: evidence shows ‘fluoride may adversely affect cognitive development in children’

  1. Anonymous August 4, 2012 at 3:46 PM

    fluoride is being put in our water to dumb us down and keep us compliant with TPTB!

    Reply
  2. sheila August 8, 2012 at 5:56 AM

    For the last 25 years I have gone way out of my way to avoid fluoride, not it is becoming common knowledge that the stuff is bad.

    Bill Cooper talked about fluoride 20 years ago and people thought he was crazy.

    stand up now or remain on your knees

    survivingsurvivalism.com

    Reply
  3. Pingback: Harvard study: evidence shows ‘fluoride may adversely affect cognitive development in children’ | Prepper Podcast Radio Network News

  4. S.W.P. August 11, 2012 at 11:18 AM

    Really now!!! How can they have it both way,Think! If I were to get caught dumping the container you see up above in the picture into the Ocean or a River I would be arrested for dumping Toxic Waste.But yet they pour it by the scoop fulls into our drinking water and say it’s fine,it’s good for you.And to top if off you have no choice on whether you want it in your municipal water supply.

    Reply
  5. anon September 10, 2012 at 10:43 PM

    I’ll give up not being able to remember where my keys are,for nice teeth . I’m 33 and have never had cavity

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

CommentLuv badge

End the Lie allows you to put your keywords with your name if you have had 9 approved comments. Use your real name and then @ your keywords (maximum of 3)

Advertise on End the Lie


Would you like to have your business or service exposed to thousands of people every day here at End the Lie? We have a wide variety of options available all at unbeatable prices. At the same time you will be supporting a truth-oriented alternative news outlet as well as hardworking independent journalists across the United States and the world.

If you would like to know more please email us and please be sure to include the details of what you are advertising, what your budget is and what type of advertising format you are looking for, including size(s), length of advertising period and any other pertinent details. The more information you give us, the more accurate the quote will be. We might also be able to work out some unique advertising tailored to your needs so feel free to contact us with questions and ideas.

Note: our advertisers have absolutely no input in what we cover or how we cover it. If this is problematic, you might want to seek out another news outlet. Here at End the Lie we put the truth first and thus no sponsor will be able to control our content. We reserve the right to refuse service to anyone and we will not advertise pornography or anything which might otherwise be illegal.