Boston TSA racially profiled minorities

Boston’s TSA officers complained that some of their colleagues have been racially profiling “suspicious” looking minority passengers, including Middle Eastern nationals, blacks and Hispanics as part of their behavioral detection program.

­The program, launched in 2003 in the wake of 9/11, requires officers to profile a large number of people every day. To meet the demand, some officers are reported to have been frequently targeting minorities in the belief that those stops were more likely to yield drugs, arrest warrants or immigration problems.

“The behavior detection program is no longer a behavior-based program, but it is a racial profiling program,” an officer, working for the Transportation Security Administration (TSA) at Logan International Airport in Boston, wrote in an anonymous complaint.

Thirty-two of his colleagues have submitted written complaints to the TSA over the targeting of minorities by their co-workers, the New York Times reported.

The racial profiling is linked to TSA’s pilot behavior detection program, which subjects passengers at pilot checkpoints to a “casual greeting” conversation with a Behavior Detection Officer (BDO) as they go through identity verification.

If based on the conversation the BDO finds the passenger “suspicious,” he or she will undergo further screening. The officers look for inconsistencies in answers and other signs of strange behavior, like avoiding eye contact, sweating or fidgeting.

But several BDO officers estimated that 80 percent of passengers searched at Logan International Airport are minorities.

“They just pull aside anyone who they don’t like the way they look – if they are black and have expensive clothes or jewelry, or if they are Hispanic,” one BDO officer said.

African-American psychologist and educational consultant, Kenneth Boatner, 68, said he was humiliated when he was detained for nearly 30 minutes as agents looked through his personal belongings – including his checkbook, cell phone and clinical notes.

TSA officers at Logan International Airport claimed that two dozen of their colleagues have consistently targeted minorities.

To this day, there is no scientific basis proving that behavioral detection is an effective way to find terrorists. The Government Accountability

Office says the method allows officers to detect simple emotions like happiness and sadness, but has not been proven to determine “when individuals hold terrorist intent and beliefs.”

Moreover, as one Boston officer said, this method “takes officers away from the real threat, and we could miss a terrorist we are looking for.”

“There is no place for racial profiling in any security program,” said TSA Executive Director David Mackey. “It is illegal, and it is not effective.”

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

CommentLuv badge

End the Lie allows you to put your keywords with your name if you have had 9 approved comments. Use your real name and then @ your keywords (maximum of 3)

Advertise on End the Lie


Would you like to have your business or service exposed to thousands of people every day here at End the Lie? We have a wide variety of options available all at unbeatable prices. At the same time you will be supporting a truth-oriented alternative news outlet as well as hardworking independent journalists across the United States and the world.

If you would like to know more please email us and please be sure to include the details of what you are advertising, what your budget is and what type of advertising format you are looking for, including size(s), length of advertising period and any other pertinent details. The more information you give us, the more accurate the quote will be. We might also be able to work out some unique advertising tailored to your needs so feel free to contact us with questions and ideas.

Note: our advertisers have absolutely no input in what we cover or how we cover it. If this is problematic, you might want to seek out another news outlet. Here at End the Lie we put the truth first and thus no sponsor will be able to control our content. We reserve the right to refuse service to anyone and we will not advertise pornography or anything which might otherwise be illegal.