TSA to take 19 months before following nude scanner court order

The TSA announced on Thursday that it will begin holding open forums next year so the public can voice concerns with the body-scanning security machines many have called invasive and dangerous — 19 months after a court told them they had to.

The US Transportation and Security Administration, the Homeland Security subdivision that oversees the screenings at domestic airports, confirmed this week that they will publish next February a notice that will advertise public hearings regarding their Advanced Imaging Technology. Wired.com reports that the U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit ordered the TSA to do as such all the way back in July of last year.

On August 1, Wired reports, the appeals court asked the TSA to explain why they had neglected to follow orders issued more than one year earlier. That notice, the Electronic Privacy Information Center says this week, was in direct response to an inquiry they filed themselves.

“Citing the agency’s extraordinary delay in seeking public comment on the controversial program, EPIC urged the court in Washington, DC to require the TSA begin the comment process in 60 days or suspend the program,” a statement released on Friday from EPIC reads. “EPIC filed the motion a year after the federal agency was ordered by the D.C. Circuit Court to “promptly” begin a public rulemaking and more than three years after a coalition of organizations petitioned Secretary Napolitano to begin the rulemaking.”

On Thursday, the TSA responded by saying that they intend to fulfill those obligations beginning in February 2013, and that a staffing issued has kept them from keeping their promise so far.

Specifically, the agency charged that there was “no basis whatsoever for its assertion that TSA has delayed implementing this court’s mandate,” despite acknowledging that it will refrain from following the appellate judge’s orders until next year.

When the appeals court ordered the TSA to “address the use of AIT through notice-and-comment rulemaking pursuant to the Administrative Procedure Act” in their July 2011 ruling, they did so after rejecting an earlier petition filed by EPIC that challenged the controversial scanners altogether. Although the court threw out EPIC’s case, it ruled that the TSA should at least allow the public to voice their concerns with the technology at an appropriate forum — something the security agency hasn’t addressed in the year since.

EPIC says in a statement posted on their website that they will respond to the TSA on September 10.

Source: Russia Today

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

CommentLuv badge

End the Lie allows you to put your keywords with your name if you have had 9 approved comments. Use your real name and then @ your keywords (maximum of 3)

Advertise on End the Lie


Would you like to have your business or service exposed to thousands of people every day here at End the Lie? We have a wide variety of options available all at unbeatable prices. At the same time you will be supporting a truth-oriented alternative news outlet as well as hardworking independent journalists across the United States and the world.

If you would like to know more please email us and please be sure to include the details of what you are advertising, what your budget is and what type of advertising format you are looking for, including size(s), length of advertising period and any other pertinent details. The more information you give us, the more accurate the quote will be. We might also be able to work out some unique advertising tailored to your needs so feel free to contact us with questions and ideas.

Note: our advertisers have absolutely no input in what we cover or how we cover it. If this is problematic, you might want to seek out another news outlet. Here at End the Lie we put the truth first and thus no sponsor will be able to control our content. We reserve the right to refuse service to anyone and we will not advertise pornography or anything which might otherwise be illegal.