Apple awarded patent for location-based remote disabling of mobile devices
By Madison Ruppert
Editor of End the Lie
Last week Apple was awarded a troubling patent, originally filed in June of 2008, which would enable a feature many users likely wouldn’t want: the remote disabling of the camera on one of Apple’s many devices via infrared signal.
Allowing for the cameras on cell phones to be remotely disabled could, in my opinion, be quite dangerous since it very well might mean that crimes could go unpunished due to the lack of video evidence which might otherwise be collected.
With reports of police attempting to buy videos from witnesses who captured a quite disturbing incident involving officers, reports of police forcibly seizing the cell phone of a witness and even reports of police allegedly confiscating the cell phone of a witness and destroying evidence of police brutality, one can imagine who would benefit from such a feature.
The patent, number 8,254,902, is entitled, “Apparatus and methods for enforcement of policies upon a wireless device” and it outlines a broad range of ways this technology could be applied for so-called “policy enforcement.”
Some of the example usages outlined in the abstract are, “to disable noise and/or light emanating from wireless devices (such as at a movie theater), for preventing wireless devices from communicating with other wireless devices (such as in academic settings), and for forcing certain electronic devices to enter “sleep mode” when entering a sensitive area.”
As Michael Zhang of PetaPixel points out, the use of this technology could actually be much more expansive and considerably more objectionable than preventing cheating in writing that the patent “showed the potential downsides of bringing cameras into the world of wireless connectivity, which appears to be the next big thing in the camera industry.”
It would be quite worrisome indeed if both phones and cameras alike could be disabled during, perhaps, a brutal crackdown on a protest or any other action which someone might not want captured like in the aforementioned cases.
Keep in mind, the patent clearly states it is “for changing one or more functional or operational aspects of a wireless device, such as upon the occurrence of a certain event.”
In other words, it is not limited to just disabling cameras. The same apparatus and methods could be used to block people from being able to call or send text messages as well.
“In one embodiment, the event [which triggers the technology] comprises detecting that the wireless device is within range of one or more other devices,” states the patent assigned to Apple Inc. of Cupertino, California.
“In another variant, the event comprises the wireless device associating with a certain access point,” the patent states.
According to Apple Insider, “The new invention can create customized alert profiles for a number of situations by using a variety of methods, including GPS, cellular triangulation and WLAN communication. Calling on a set of predefined rules called “policy enforcement,” a device’s actions, or lack thereof, can be dynamically changed to create a situationally aware phone.”
Apple Insider reports that Apple is mostly leveraging radio technologies in this effort with one embodiment of the technology using Wi-Fi.
The user’s device would communicate with a Wi-Fi base station which then selects the particular alert parameters according to the situation. For instance, in a classroom it would likely prevent sending text messages, internet browsing, etc. or perhaps just put the device into silent mode.
The more troubling version of the technology, however, is the use of GPS which would trigger a certain profile on the device based on the location of the device. This could allow phones to be disabled when they enter the area in which a protest is occurring or any other target area for that matter.
At least Apple Insider leaves us with the comforting conclusion, “It is unclear when or if Apple will use the patent.” Let’s hope they don’t because the last thing we need is fewer cameras around to capture injustices of any and every variety.
Did I forget anything or miss any errors? Would you like to make me aware of a story or subject to cover? Or perhaps you want to bring your writing to a wider audience? Feel free to contact me at [email protected] with your concerns, tips, questions, original writings, insults or just about anything that may strike your fancy.
Please support our work and help us start to pay contributors by doing your shopping through our Amazon link or check out some must-have products at our store.
Madison Ruppert is a Los Angeles-based independent journalist and researcher as well as the founder, owner, administrator and editor of EndtheLie.com. He has no affiliations with any government agencies, political parties, non-governmental organizations, or economic schools. He is available for freelance writing assignments and appearances or interviews in any format. He can be reached by emailing
How about NO??!!
Shouldn’t that patent have been denied because any use of it would violate cell phone owners rights of privacy?
Rick Carufel recently posted: Parasitic Publishers and their Putrid Pontifications.
Buy a fancy phone and that’s what you get , my £25 phone will take pictures anywhere any time and can only be switched off by me .
Good for Apple. They are seeing the future and getting on it beforehand.
I’m not saying it is a good thing for us- in fact, I don’t like it, but it is to come sooner or later by order of the feds, so they figure they better be the first. If Apple didn’t do this, some others would anyway.
The power is still in the people- don’t buy a phone with this option, and they have to stop using it.
shill alert!
Walt,
Your just another fan boy loser.
What? They wouldn’t apply for a patent if they didn’t have an inside track on what Orwellian future awaits us. Competitors wouldn’t include such features unless the govt forces them to, and then here come the royalty checks.
What about making the phones unable to work in cars without the appropriate hands free kit and texting disabled while the engine is running, these would be more appropriate I would think.
if only they could remotely disable guns on school perimeters and ban all non-smart guns (i.e. ‘last century’ guns that cannot be electronically disabled on school grounds)…