Obama reportedly signs classified cyberwarfare policy directive with troubling implications

By End the Lie

(Image credit: Open Congress)

The Washington Post has reported that Obama himself signed a classified cyberwarfare policy directive, which is especially interesting given that the Cybersecurity Act of 2012 just failed on a 51-47 vote in the Senate, according to Hillicon Valley.

The Cybersecurity Act of 2012 met some early opposition among the likes of John McCain (who introduced his own legislation to compete) and apparently even with its prominent supporters it was not able to pass.

Yet the United States government is likely not at all concerned since Obama went ahead and signed a secret policy directive that “effectively enables the military to act more aggressively to thwart cyber­attacks on the nation’s web of government and private computer networks,” according to The Washington Post.

Obviously the most interesting – and, arguably, alarming – bit of that statement is, “and private computer networks.”

This is especially interesting because the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) of Fiscal Year 2012 actually included an offensive cyberwarfare provision, although it did not specifically state that private computer networks could be brought under government control.

Indeed, while the language of “defense” is regularly used, as it is in the above Washington Post article, one can quite easily notice that private networks would undoubtedly be placed, at least to some extent, in government hands, regardless of defense needs.

For those who have been paying attention, this prospect might seem especially troubling since the government can’t even manage to secure the American drone fleet or US Central Command systems.

Unfortunately, the Washington Post report is by no means unconfirmed and unreliable, as The Hill reported that a senior official in the Obama administration indeed confirmed that Obama signed a directive on “cyber operations.”

“This step is part of the administration’s focus on cybersecurity as a top priority,” the official said to The Hill. “The cyber threat has evolved since 2004, and we have new experiences to take into account.”

However, the official claimed that the directive does not give any new powers to federal agencies or the military; although we simply have to take his or her word for it since the directive itself is secret.

“The directive establishes principles and processes for the use of cyber operations so that cyber tools are integrated with the fully [sic] array of national security tools we have at our disposal,” said the official.

“It provides a whole-of-government approach consistent with the values that we promote domestically and internationally as we have previously articulated in the International Strategy for Cyberspace,” the official said.

One must wonder if “Plan X” being developed by the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA) is at all related to what is being called Presidential Policy Directive 20.

“What [Presidential Policy Directive 20] does, really for the first time, is it explicitly talks about how we will use cyber operations,” an anonymous senior White House official said to The Washington Post.

“Network defense is what you’re doing inside your own networks. . . . Cyber-operations is stuff outside that space, and recognizing that you could be doing that for what might be called defensive purposes,” the official said.

However, apparently this isn’t entirely new since, according to the Post, it is an update of a 2004 presidential directive.

“It should enable people to arrive at more effective decisions,” said another unnamed senior official in the Obama administration cited by the Post. “In that sense, it’s an enormous step forward.”

What kind of a step forward will it be? Is this heading in a positive direction? Let us know by giving your feedback in the comments section.

Did I forget anything or miss any errors? Would you like to make me aware of a story or subject to cover? Or perhaps you want to bring your writing to a wider audience? Feel free to contact me at [email protected] with your concerns, tips, questions, original writings, insults or just about anything that may strike your fancy.

Please support our work and help us start to pay contributors by doing your shopping through our Amazon link or check out some must-have products at our store.

Top Search Terms Used to Find This Page:

3 Responses to Obama reportedly signs classified cyberwarfare policy directive with troubling implications

  1. End time servant November 15, 2012 at 5:54 AM

    Some evil behind closed doors we might not never know till it is upon us keep up your great work

    Reply
  2. Nora November 15, 2012 at 7:30 AM

    This underscores and confirms that the congressional body is a useless bunch of impotent s who have succeeded at self-enrichment at the expense of the American people while completely ignoring their wishes and concerns. It’s time to revamp our government at both state and federal levels, and the first step is getting rid of the dead wood in the legislative branch. Secrecy and government have become synonymous. We have given our authority to act on our behalf while a creeping evil has spoiled the very nature of the arrangement. Time to revoke and repeal the 19th amendment, and throw out the ineffective sissies who won’t stand up for God, country, lawfulness or our personal freedoms.

    Reply
    • ? November 18, 2012 at 10:01 AM

      Your name is Nora, so I’m going to assume you are a woman. How will repealing the 19th amendment help promote God, country, lawfulness or our personal freedoms?

      Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

Advertise on End the Lie

Would you like to have your business or service exposed to thousands of people every day here at End the Lie? We have a wide variety of options available all at unbeatable prices. At the same time you will be supporting a truth-oriented alternative news outlet as well as hardworking independent journalists across the United States and the world.

If you would like to know more please email us and please be sure to include the details of what you are advertising, what your budget is and what type of advertising format you are looking for, including size(s), length of advertising period and any other pertinent details. The more information you give us, the more accurate the quote will be. We might also be able to work out some unique advertising tailored to your needs so feel free to contact us with questions and ideas.

Note: our advertisers have absolutely no input in what we cover or how we cover it. If this is problematic, you might want to seek out another news outlet. Here at End the Lie we put the truth first and thus no sponsor will be able to control our content. We reserve the right to refuse service to anyone and we will not advertise pornography, gambling, drugs, alcohol, tobacco or anything that might otherwise be illegal.