Texas high school student withdrawn after RFID protest

By Brent Daggett

Contributing writer for End the Lie

Texas sophomore, Andrea Hernandez, has been involuntary withdrawn from John Jay High School due to her refusal to participate in the district’s Smart ID program.

Note: be sure to check out Brent’s previous articles: “Rewrite of Senate bill could let feds spy on e-mail without obtaining a search warrant” and “Secession petitions in full swing in all 50 states after presidential election

Effective November 26, Hernandez will have to attend William Howard Taft High School unless she complies with her former school’s wishes to wear a RFID badge. See the letter she was sent below:

Click to see full size

The Smart ID Program, started in September, requires students attending Jay High School and Jones Middle School to wear a badge containing a photo of themselves, their name and a barcode with an RFID locator chip to determine their location anywhere on campus.

On the school’s website, they state it will help with student safety.

I believe this is an erroneous statement since the real motivation seems to be that the district will gain around 2 million dollars if attendance increases.

One of Andrea and her family’s objections to the technology is that the chip goes against their Christian faith, since it may tie into the Mark of the Beast prophesied in the Revelation.

Revelations 13:16-18 reads, “16 He causes all, both small and great, rich and poor, free and slave, to receive a mark on their right hand or on their foreheads, 17 and that no one may buy or sell except one who has the mark or[a] the name of the beast, or the number of his name. 18 Here is wisdom. Let him who has understanding calculate the number of the beast, for it is the number of a man: His number is 666. (New King James Version)

Instead of going into every single piece of information involved in the story, watch these videos that appear on YouTube: Texas Students Treated Like Cattle with Mandatory RFID Tags as well as Christian Family Refuses Mandatory RFID Chip at Texas School.

So far the good news is that the Rutherford Institute, who will be representing Andrea, was able to get a district court judge in Bexar County, Texas, to grant a temporary restraining order to prevent the North Side School District from removing Andrea.

“The court’s willingness to grant a temporary restraining order is a good first step, but there is still a long way to go—not just in this case, but dealing with the mindset, in general, that everyone needs to be monitored and controlled,” said John W. Whitehead, president of The Rutherford Institute.

“Regimes in the past have always started with the schools, where they develop a compliant citizenry. These ‘Student Locator’ programs are ultimately aimed at getting students used to living in a total surveillance state where there will be no privacy, and wherever you go and whatever you text or email will be watched by the government.”

While the school district is trying to paint a picturesque image of the Smart ID program’s sophistication, there are over 40 civil liberties and privacy organizations that object to its use.

On August 21, 2012, Consumers Against Supermarket Privacy Invasion and Numbering (CASPIAN), Electronic Privacy Information Center (EPIC), and Privacy Rights Clearinghouse released a Position Paper on the Use of RFID in Schools addressing the concerns of a 2003 Position Statement on the Use of RFID on Consumer Products.

Part of that document states the following dangers:

  • Dehumanizing uses: While there is an expectation of supervision and guidance in schools, monitoring the detailed behaviors of individuals can be demeaning. For example, RFID reading devices in school restrooms could monitor how long a student or teacher spends in a bathroom stall.
  • Violation of free speech and association. RFID tracking software can monitor associations of RFID tags, which could dissuade individuals from exercising their rights to freedom of thought, speech and association. For example, students might avoid seeking counsel when they know their RFID tags will document their presence at locations like counselor and School Resource Officer (SRO) offices.
  • Violation of conscience and religious freedom. Many individuals object to RFID systems on the basis of their deeply held philosophical or religious beliefs. Schools are required to make accommodations for students on the basis of these beliefs.
  • Unauthorized use. While RFID systems may be developed for use in a school, the RFID tags may be read covertly anywhere by anyone with the right reading device. Since RFID reading devices work by silent, invisible radio waves and the reading devices can be hidden, unauthorized or covert uses can be nearly impossible to detect. In addition, information collected on systems could be shared or compromised without individuals’ knowledge or consent. For example, a student’s location could be monitored from a distance by a jealous girlfriend or boyfriend, stalker, or pedophile. Individuals run this tracking risk any place they carry or wear a school-issued RFID tagged item—even miles from the campus.

It’s also pertinent to mention the likelihood of health effects as stated by the report.

  • Potential health risks.  RFID systems emit electronic radiation, and there are lingering questions about whether human health might be affected in environments where the reading devices are pervasive.  This concern and the dehumanizing effects of ubiquitous surveillance may place additional stress on students, parents, and teachers.

While the debate on RFID technology, especially in the avenues of tracking or chipping humans (read my first article on RFID technology) is not going away, let’s hope more individuals stand up to the abuses of the technology and let’s also hope that pilot programs of this magnitude are found unconstitutional on the grounds of the First and Fourth Amendments.

“We don’t think kids in schools should be treated like cattle,” Marc Rotenberg, the executive director of the Electronic Privacy Information Center, said in a telephone interview [as reported by Wired Magazine]. “We generally don’t like it. My take on RFID is it’s fine for products, but not so much for people. That’s one of the places where the lines need to be drawn.”

Edited by End the Lie

Did I forget anything or miss any errors? Would you like to make me aware of a story or subject to cover? Or perhaps you want to bring your writing to a wider audience? Feel free to contact me at [email protected] with your concerns, tips, questions, original writings, insults or just about anything that may strike your fancy.

Please support Brent’s work by shopping through his Amazon affiliate link or check out the End the Lie Store.

Top Search Terms Used to Find This Page:

11 Responses to Texas high school student withdrawn after RFID protest

  1. Mannard November 25, 2012 at 4:47 PM

    Bless you Andrea and good job refusing THAT CHIP…

    Because after all, when it comes down to it all the RFID chip is about is CONTROL.

    Reply
  2. Privacy is Your Right November 25, 2012 at 6:18 PM

    Miss Hernandez is really brave for standing up and saying no. I applaud her.

    I’m sure it hasn’t been easy for her.

    But her courage could facilitate a change.

    I was the only one in my class who refused to dissect a frog! I got a lower grade, but stood firm.

    And now today they use computer programs to learn about frog anatomy because eventually a lot of people stood up against live dissection.

    Hopefully other students will emulate Miss Hernandez and say no to the RFID chip.

    The question is…why are other parents allowing it?

    The RFID chip worse than even Orwell could have envisioned!

    Reply
  3. Privacy is Your Right November 25, 2012 at 6:19 PM

    Miss Hernandez is really brave for standing up and saying no. I applaud her.

    I’m sure it hasn’t been easy for her.

    But her courage could facilitate a change.

    I was the only one in my class who refused to dissect a frog! I got a lower grade, but stood firm.

    And now today they use computer programs to learn about frog anatomy because eventually a lot of people stood up against live dissection.

    Hopefully other students will emulate Miss Hernandez and say no to the RFID chip.

    The question is…why are other parents allowing it?

    The RFID chip is worse than even Orwell could have envisioned!

    Reply
  4. Nora November 25, 2012 at 7:21 PM

    God bless that family. What a brave, good girl. Unless we wake up to this tyranny and take a stand, they’re going to push this kind of thing until every child in America is under constant scrutiny every minute of their lives and subjected to unnecessary tracking.
    The health effects from the electronic stew we’re now living in are going to become apparent. Push back and stop it, while you can. It only takes a few lucid people to speak up and refuse to go along with it, so don’t allow our children to be “conditioned” like this. No amount of money is worth giving up your dignity and self worth.

    Reply
  5. Zeathaminor November 26, 2012 at 1:37 AM

    The intentions are bare for every one to see …condition this young test subjects to feel confortable & safe in a controled enviroment for now (after all they are the future right?), from this article this trial project already looks above 90% successful .. and when a project like this gets peddled as a success it ends up catching everyone like a wild fire “because it was cool” trust America …

    Reply
  6. Pingback: A Family’s Fight for Freedom-Lawyers Move to Block RFID Expulsion « kracktivist

  7. GreenForest November 26, 2012 at 7:52 AM

    As we all know, once the door is open (by the government) then it can never be closed. Then, like Social Security & welfare programs it will continue to expand.

    When formal approval for assassination(s) is issued then who decides who shall die? What is the definition of ‘enemy of the state’?

    First, the usual world terrorist will be on the list, but then they’ll be coming after each of us.

    Need to read this new book out called, The Diary by Oliver, cause this is about Americans fighting back. One day each of us could become an ‘enemy of the state’. It’s a thriller & so real that I recommend it.

    http://www.booksbyoliver.com

    When they do identify us then the drones will drop their bombs on us & our family members. Where is the outrage from Americans?

    Reply
  8. Pingback: Local laws putting the brakes on food truck vendors

  9. Pingback: Smart house technology is not as futuristic as we think

  10. Pingback: NOW DO YOU BELIEVE ? I SAID, NOW DO YOU BELEIVE THAT SATAN IS ALIVE AND DOING WELL !!!!!!! « GOD, GUTS,OLD GLORYand AMMO

  11. Mark December 18, 2012 at 6:16 AM

    I don’t understand why people would let schools put harmful devices on or in our children just for monitoring them. It is a clear violation of freedom, and needs to be stopped. There are cameras everywhere now anyway. Are those not enough?

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

Advertise on End the Lie


Would you like to have your business or service exposed to thousands of people every day here at End the Lie? We have a wide variety of options available all at unbeatable prices. At the same time you will be supporting a truth-oriented alternative news outlet as well as hardworking independent journalists across the United States and the world.

If you would like to know more please email us and please be sure to include the details of what you are advertising, what your budget is and what type of advertising format you are looking for, including size(s), length of advertising period and any other pertinent details. The more information you give us, the more accurate the quote will be. We might also be able to work out some unique advertising tailored to your needs so feel free to contact us with questions and ideas.

Note: our advertisers have absolutely no input in what we cover or how we cover it. If this is problematic, you might want to seek out another news outlet. Here at End the Lie we put the truth first and thus no sponsor will be able to control our content. We reserve the right to refuse service to anyone and we will not advertise pornography or anything which might otherwise be illegal.