Both parties harshly criticize Obama administration’s deal aimed at curbing Iranian nuclear program

By End the Lie

 Iranian President Hassan Rouhani delivers remarks at the Hilton Hotel in New York City on September 26, 2013. (Kenji Takigami/Asia Society/Flickr)


Iranian President Hassan Rouhani delivers remarks at the Hilton Hotel in New York City on September 26, 2013. (Kenji Takigami/Asia Society/Flickr)

Individuals from both parties in Washington lashed out against the Obama administration over the deal on Iran’s nuclear program, which was reached Saturday with five other major world powers.

Iranian President Hassan Rouhani seemed to view the deal positively, saying that world powers recognized his country’s “nuclear rights.”

Individuals in Congress, however, are saying that the deal gives too much to Iran by lifting sanctions just to get a deal through.

Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.), for example, said the deal is “so far away from what the end game should look like,” according to the Guardian.

Graham told CNN that he believes the goal of any deal “should be to stop enrichment.” Yet Iran had previously stated that they consider their “right to enrichment” a non-negotiable.

“This [deal] allows 18,000 centrifuges to stay in place and it basically suspends construction of the plutonium reactor. We’re so far away what the end game should look like. I’m very worried,” Graham said.

Yet it is not just Republicans speaking out against the deal, which is expected to a certain extent.

Sen. Robert Menendez (D-N.J.), chair of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, also criticized the Obama administration’s deal with Iran.

“This agreement did not proportionately reduce Iran’s nuclear program,” Menendez said in a statement.

The Obama administration is already defending the deal.

Tony Blinken, deputy national security adviser for the Obama administration, said on NPR that the deal is positive because “for the first time in a decade, it halts Iran’s program, and indeed it rolls it back in certain key respects.”

Some contend that Congress could actually derail the deal with Iran, since the goals of some in Congress “diverge sharply from the goals of the White House,” as Businessweek’s Cameron Abadi puts it.

Sen. Marco Rubio (R-Fla.) is among those who take a line thoroughly opposed to that of the Obama administration.

“There is now an even more urgent need for Congress to increase sanctions until Iran completely abandons its enrichment and reprocessing capabilities,” Rubio said in response to the deal made in Geneva.

Currently, a bipartisan group in Congress is pushing a bill that would automatically put new sanctions in place if Iran fails to sign on to a more comprehensive deal during the six-month period of the interim agreement.

If signed into law, it could also specify boundaries for the negotiations and what Congress would consider an acceptable comprehensive agreement.

Interestingly, some in Iran are also unhappy with the deal. One hardline news outlet in Iran said that “there is no doubt the agreement is oppressive” and another saying that the agreement did not concede Iran’s supposed “right to enrich.”

The opinions published in the more reformist media outlets in Iran said that the agreement in Geneva might signal a shift towards a new political culture in Iran and a foreign policy pivot, according to Time.

I’d love to hear your opinion, take a look at your story tips and even your original writing if you would like to get it published. Please email me at [email protected]

Please support alternative news and help us start paying contributors by donating, doing your shopping through our Amazon link or check out some must-have products at our store.

One Response to Both parties harshly criticize Obama administration’s deal aimed at curbing Iranian nuclear program

  1. John USN November 25, 2013 at 8:27 PM

    Evil people and/or, evil corporations are always the losers for any peace agreements.
    Sanctions lifted means more free market means good for us regular hardworking folks.
    No war on Syria now now war on Iran. I guess Saudi is pissed because oil is coming down.
    Seems like Pres. Obama is getting closer to a real Nobel Prize winner.
    But who cares.

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

Advertise on End the Lie

Would you like to have your business or service exposed to thousands of people every day here at End the Lie? We have a wide variety of options available all at unbeatable prices. At the same time you will be supporting a truth-oriented alternative news outlet as well as hardworking independent journalists across the United States and the world.

If you would like to know more please email us and please be sure to include the details of what you are advertising, what your budget is and what type of advertising format you are looking for, including size(s), length of advertising period and any other pertinent details. The more information you give us, the more accurate the quote will be. We might also be able to work out some unique advertising tailored to your needs so feel free to contact us with questions and ideas.

Note: our advertisers have absolutely no input in what we cover or how we cover it. If this is problematic, you might want to seek out another news outlet. Here at End the Lie we put the truth first and thus no sponsor will be able to control our content. We reserve the right to refuse service to anyone and we will not advertise pornography, gambling, drugs, alcohol, tobacco or anything that might otherwise be illegal.