Obama admin weighing another drone strike on U.S. citizen accused of terrorism

By End the Lie

President Barack Obama speaking in 2012 (Image credit: Daniel Borman/Flickr)

President Barack Obama speaking in 2012 (Image credit: Daniel Borman/Flickr)

Obama administration officials revealed that they are considering a drone strike on a U.S. citizen who they say is a member of al-Qaida and actively planning attacks on Americans abroad.

Read our latest: “Security researcher: Sochi hacking story was ‘100% fraudulent,’ NBC defends report” and “Plane forced to land after Ukrainian hijacker attempts to divert jet to Sochi

In May of last year, Attorney General Eric Holder publicly confirmed that U.S. drone strikes have killed four American citizens in Yemen in Pakistan without charge or trial.

In the same month, Obama announced new restrictions on drone strikes, which some say may be breached in this case.

While the Obama administration’s policy is that only the military can kill Americans overseas who are suspected terrorists, officials said the president could buck those guidelines and allow the CIA to use a drone strike, according to the National Journal.

The Associated Press cited four unnamed U.S. officials who said that the suspected terrorist is currently in a national that refuses to allow U.S. military operations on their soil. The country also reportedly is unable to pursue the unidentified American citizen.

Two of the officials said the man is an al-Qaeda facilitator who is directly responsible for deadly attacks on American citizens overseas.

The man also “continues to plan attacks against them that would use improvised explosive devices,” according to the two officials cited by AP.

Yet another U.S. official said that the Department of Defense is not yet settled on if the man is actually dangerous enough “to merit the potential domestic fallout of killing an American without charging him with a crime or trying him.”

Another concern would be the significant international issues that could arise if an operation was carried out in a country that will not allow U.S. military action on their territory.

A different U.S. official told the AP that the Pentagon already decided to recommend killing the man.

The suspected terrorist is reportedly in a well-guarded, remote location. Any attempt to capture him using U.S. troops without the approval of the local government “would be risky and even more politically explosive than a U.S. missile strike,” the AP reports, citing military officials.

An unnamed senior administration official said that the Department of justice is currently building a case for the president to review and decide if the strike will be carried out.

The procedure is the same as the one followed when the U.S. killed Anwar al-Awlaki in Yemen in 2011. Al-Awlaki was a well-known militant cleric and U.S. citizen.

The Justice Department has to build a case showing that the killing of the American is “legal and constitutional.” The administration has to show that the Pentagon can take action against the citizen as an enemy combatant under the 2001 Authorization for Use of Military Force.

Under the new Obama administration guidelines, they must show that the target poses “continuing, imminent threat to U.S. persons.” Lethal force can only be used “o prevent or stop attacks against U.S. persons, and even then, only when capture is not feasible and no other reasonable alternatives exist to address the threat effectively.”

The AP, as per the government’s request, withheld the name of the country because U.S. officials said it could “interrupt ongoing counterterror operations.”

The Pentagon, CIA and Justice Department all declined to comment for the AP.

We would love to hear your opinion, take a look at your story tips and even your original writing if you would like to get it published. Please email us at [email protected]

Please support alternative news and help us start paying contributors by donating, doing your shopping through our Amazon link or check out some must-have products at our store.

6 Responses to Obama admin weighing another drone strike on U.S. citizen accused of terrorism

  1. Jay Kenney February 12, 2014 at 9:43 AM

    “Accused” American citizen? Guess if you’re an American citizen outside of US territory, you forfeit you’re Constitutional rights. Why I fear “my” government…

    Reply
  2. wasntme February 27, 2014 at 6:03 AM

    The Justice Department has to build a case showing that the killing of the American is “legal and constitutional.”

    No due process in NOT legal or Constitutional. Why don’t they spend the time making a court case against them man and trying him on absenteeism? At least it might give the appearance of a fair trial and that they are trying to follow our laws.

    Reply
  3. Arky April 7, 2014 at 7:10 PM

    This is state terrorism and a crime against humanity — nothing more, nothing less. I hope I live long enough to see Nuremberg II and swift/sure justice dished out to our fearless leaders.

    They deserve a fair trial, followed by a same day execution.

    Reply
  4. locust June 7, 2014 at 9:02 AM

    I have posted for years (and had an article published on this website) — Public Law 107-40 (aka AUMF) is the bane of our existence and the reason why America is trapped in insanity.
    This law declared war against enemies to be named later. This law was rushed through Congress in the aftermath of the false flag 9/11 attacks, with an alacrity that would have pleased Adolf Hitler (compare the PL 107-40 to the Reichstag Fire Decree of 1933 Germany).

    Bush the Moron named the Taliban and al-Qaeda as our enemies, for starters.
    Look at what Obama the Deceiver is doing now – he’s naming new enemies individually, perhaps while having tea and scones on the veranda like any other petty tyrant.

    This law started the never-ending DAFT war to forever defend us against future terrorists by military means.

    America is trapped in forever war until this law is overturned.

    Reply
  5. JimW September 10, 2014 at 8:22 AM

    “America is trapped in forever war until this law is overturned.”

    America is trapped in perpetual war as long as this gangster government is runing our country.

    This “government” is fundementally incompatible with peace.

    Reply
  6. Anonymous September 12, 2014 at 10:03 AM

    og ,mudbone

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

Advertise on End the Lie

Would you like to have your business or service exposed to thousands of people every day here at End the Lie? We have a wide variety of options available all at unbeatable prices. At the same time you will be supporting a truth-oriented alternative news outlet as well as hardworking independent journalists across the United States and the world.

If you would like to know more please email us and please be sure to include the details of what you are advertising, what your budget is and what type of advertising format you are looking for, including size(s), length of advertising period and any other pertinent details. The more information you give us, the more accurate the quote will be. We might also be able to work out some unique advertising tailored to your needs so feel free to contact us with questions and ideas.

Note: our advertisers have absolutely no input in what we cover or how we cover it. If this is problematic, you might want to seek out another news outlet. Here at End the Lie we put the truth first and thus no sponsor will be able to control our content. We reserve the right to refuse service to anyone and we will not advertise pornography, gambling, drugs, alcohol, tobacco or anything that might otherwise be illegal.